TokyoTokyo Mon - Fri 10:00-18:00 +81 (366) 701-751
info@mountequitygroup.com

Blog

New bill would 'open up Big Tech's hood,' make companies explain how they decide which content to show

Rep. Doris Matsui, D-Calif., left, and Sen. Ed Markey, D-Mass.Bill Clark | CQ Roll Call | Getty Images; Jemal Countess | Getty ImagesA new federal bill seeks to demystify how social media platforms determine which posts users see, without touching a law that has become a lightning rod in Congress.The Algorithmic Justice and Online Platform Transparency Act of 2021, announced by Sen. Ed Markey, D-Mass., and Rep. Doris Matsui, D-Calif., on Thursday, seeks to expose and address social injustices that are exacerbated by algorithmic amplification online.In this particular usage of the word, “algorithms” are parts of software programs that sites like Facebook, Twitter and Google use to determine which content and advertisements to show users. The bill would prohibit platforms from using algorithms that discriminate based on protected characteristics like race and gender, empower the Federal Trade Commission to review platforms’ algorithmic processes, and create a new inter-agency task force to investigate discrimination in algorithms. Platforms would also have to explain to users how they use algorithms and what information they use to run them.”It is time to open up Big Tech’s hood, enact strict prohibitions on harmful algorithms, and prioritize justice for communities who have long been discriminated against as we work toward platform accountability,” Markey said in a statement.Researchers and government agencies have accused the platforms of employing discriminatory algorithms in the past. For example, in 2019, the Department of Housing and Urban Development accused Facebook of breaking housing discrimination laws with its ad targeting. Shortly after that, researchers from Northeastern University, the University of Southern California, and nonprofit group Upturn found Facebook’s ad delivery algorithm could discriminate based on race and gender, even if that’s not what advertisers intended. Facebook said at the time it stands “against discrimination in any form” and pointed to changes it made to its ad targeting tools to address some of the concerns.Not touching Section 230The new bill is a notable approach to tech reform in part because of what it does not do: Touch the hotly debated legal shield that protects companies from liability over what users post online.Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act is a 1990s-era law that says online platforms are not responsible for their users’ speech and empowers platforms to moderate their services essentially as they see fit. In recent years, both Democrats and Republicans have criticized the shield as too broad.But altering Section 230 is no easy task. Democrats and Republicans disagree on its problems and how to solve them. Progressives advocate for removing liability protection for platforms that fail to moderate certain types of content, fearing the proliferation of hate speech. Conservatives say the law should limit what platforms are allowed to moderate, claiming the platforms suppress posts expressing conservative viewpoints (the companies have denied this).Many legal scholars have warned of the potential unintended harms that could come from scaling back Section 230. Platforms could actually be incentivized to limit speech much further than intended, for example.Progressive digital rights group Fight for the Future sees the new bill as a responsible way of addressing harm by Big Tech companies “without poking holes in Section 230,” according to a statement.While introduced by two Democrats, the bill touches on a key tenet put forth by Republicans earlier this year on how they seek to handle tech reform. In an April memo, Republican staff for the House Energy and Commerce Committee urged an emphasis on transparency in content moderation practices. Markey and Matsui’s bill would require online platforms to publish annual reports for the public about their content moderation practices.WATCH: The messy business of content moderation on Facebook, Twitter, YouTubeSubscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

Google to pay fine, change ad business to settle French antitrust case: report

Google’s parent company, Alphabet, is expected to pay a fine and change some business practices to settle an antitrust case with the French government over its online advertising business, the Wall Street Journal reported Thursday.

France’s Competition Authority has alleged that Google’s advertising tool DoubleClick, which online publishers use to sell ad space, gave an advantage to Google’s own online ad auction system over other companies, according to the paper, which cited people familiar with the matter. 

To settle the charges, Google has reportedly offered to remove obstacles faced by competitors within its ad exchange. The changes would only be legally binding in France but could be adopted companywide to appease critics in other countries.

The alleged settlement talks come as regulators around the world have ramped up scrutiny of Google’s ad business, which brought the company about $23.7 billion in revenue last year. 

Ten US states sued Google in December, accusing the company of offering Facebook special treatment in exchange for the social media site reducing competition in the advertising space, the Journal reported. Antitrust authorities in Britain and the European Union are also investigating various aspects of the company’s ad practices. 

Regulators around the world have ramped up scrutiny of Google’s ad business, which brought the company about $23.7 billion in revenue last year.REUTERS

The French antitrust inquiry, which the government has not discussed publicly, originated with a 2019 complaint brought by News Corp., French newspaper Le Figaro and Belgian-French newspaper publisher Groupe Rossel, according to the Journal. News Corp. publishes The Post as well as the Journal.

Le Figaro removed itself from the antitrust complaint after it reached an agreement in November to license its work to Google for a fee, the Journal reported. 

A settlement in the French antitrust case could reportedly be announced within weeks, although it could also be rejected by the Competition Authority’s board. 

Google and News Corp. did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Le Figaro and Groupe Rossel could not be reached. 

Job searches reportedly spike in states ending US unemployment checks

Workers in states that are scrapping the extra $300-a-week in federal unemployment benefits started searching for jobs on the day their states announced the moves, according to a new report.

On the day states said they would end the checks, which critics say are making it hard for businesses to hire workers as they struggle to recover from the pandemic — clicks for job postings spiked by 5 percent, compared to the last two weeks of April, according to a Friday report from Indeed.com.

From announcement day to three days later, the states in which benefits are ending early received a 3- to 4-percent boost in job search clicks compared to the national average, according to the report. By the eighth day after the announcement, search interest had “vanished,” it said.

The most sought-after jobs were in marketing, sales, hospitality and tourism. But searches for high-paying jobs, including physicians and surgeons, also spiked, according to the report.

Two dozen states are ending the $300 weekly unemployment benefits as soon as June — and well before Sept. 6 when they officially run out nationwide. Some states, including Arizona, Oklahoma and Montana, are also offering bonuses for residents who return to work.

An Indeed.com report found job search activity rose, relative to national trends, in states that announced they’d prematurely end federal unemployment insurance benefits. Indeed.com

The generous US benefits, when combined with state unemployment funds, can exceed what many employees earn by working. The tight labor market has resulted in a rash of hiring bonuses ranging from $500 for hourly workers to thousands of dollars for highly sought-after employees including warehouse workers and truck drivers.

The Indeed.com report, however, said the “disincentive effect” of the federal benefits is hard to measure, because there are other factors affecting the labor supply, including consumers’ fear of COVID-19, caregiving challenges and even Americans’ “eagerness to enjoy a vaccinated, reopened summer.” 

Ellen Booth, 57, of Rhode Island, studies to become a certified medical coder, new employment she decided to go for after her restaurant job ended last year during the pandemic. She says she’s living off her retirement funds since her unemployment benefits have run out.AP

All of the states that are ending the program early are led by Republican governors, but according to a recent Quinnipiac University poll, 54 percent of American agree with the move to stop the benefits. Just 38 percent of the respondents thought it is the wrong decision.

There are some 3.5 million people collecting unemployment in the states that are ending the $300 checks, according to Daniel Zhao, a senior economist at Glassdoor, CNBC reported. 

Facebook, Twitter and a future of social that's increasingly audio

When pandemic lockdowns swept the country in Spring 2020, there were concerns that the booming podcast business might take a pause — the dramatic decline in people commuting meant fewer people listening on the go. Podcast downloads did initially decline, 10% between February 25 and March 25, but instead of that decline accelerating, digital audio rebounded, and 2020 catapulted a new generation of social audio companies into prominence.The new format — live conversations — emerged as an audio trend that has social media giants stepping up efforts to keep their control over internet experiences. One of the audio upstarts, Discord — which started as a chat platform for gamers and has been around since 2015 — saw its popularity explode. Meanwhile, Clubhouse, which launched during the pandemic, quickly scaled its user base to number in the millions and its valuation into the billions.Defying expectations, podcasting revenue continued to grow and eMarketer had to revise its 2020 estimate from a 1% decline in the time U.S. adults spend with audio, to 8.3% growth, for about an hour and a half a day. Clubhouse claims users spend over one hour, on average, on the app daily.While people may have been commuting less, and may have spent the pandemic’s early days watching the news, the versatility of the audio format endured: people listened while cooking, cleaning, and exercising. It turns out that audio may be the last unfilled window of consumers’ time: there are many more occasions in which someone can listen, or even participate in a conversation, than they can glue their eyes to a video.Witthaya Prasongsin | Moment | Getty ImagesDiscord landed at No. 3 on this year’s CNBC Disruptor 50 list because of its scale and fast growth. The company that enables people for conversations via text and audio chat, along with video, says it has about 150 million monthly active users, up from 56 million at the end of 2019. The company enables people to set up “channels” or virtual rooms, that serve as online communities to talk about different topics. While the company’s early user base was largely focused on talking about video games, the company’s appeal has expanded dramatically in the past year, as people found communities on the platform to talk about video games, news, sports or fantasy football, and their neighborhoods. More coverage of the 2021 CNBC Disruptor 50Meet the 2021 CNBC Disruptor 50 companiesWhy Robinhood is the No. 1 companyA look back at the CNBC Disruptor 50: 9 years, 233 companiesWhen disruption becomes a force for good — and badCybereason CEO told world about DarkSide from a bomb shelterRipple on the future of cryptocurrencies as international bans increaseHow Relativity Space is reinventing the rocket, and building a multiplanetary futureDiscord lays out its game theory on the virtual ‘space’ of the futureIt’s not a vaccine passport, but more people travel ‘CLEAR’Patreon CEO on the ‘incredible leverage” creators now possessClubhouse has ‘millions more’ waiting to join its audio appHow we choose Disruptor companiesIts CEO Jason Citron wants to provide the best version of community “space” on the internet, whether that be the reimagining of a dorm room, library, restaurant or auditorium experience in a virtual environment. Citron says many Discord users today still experience it in smaller groups of friends, say six to 10 people, but the company sees significant potential in satisfying the needs of bigger communities around topics of interest, and that is a focus of new product development, including its Stage channels.”We see tremendous opportunity to grow our business model,” he said.The platform drew the attention of Microsoft, which bid a reported $10 billion for the platform — in an ironic twist, Citron and his Discord co-founder Stanislav Vishnevskiy were gamers who started the company because they were frustrated with communication technology like Microsoft’s Skype.Discord has raised nearly $500 million from investors including Sony Interactive Entertainment, Tencent, Index Ventures, and Reid Hoffman’s Greylock.Clubhouse launched in April 2020 as an invite-only live audio conversation platform with events hosted by people in the community. The app’s audience grew in the early months of the pandemic, bolstered by the frequent participation of Andreessen Horowitz partners, who have led three rounds of investment into the company. Facebook, Twitter, Spotify talk backBut it was in February that Clubhouse user numbers really took off: Tesla CEO Elon Musk and Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg both appeared in Clubhouse chats, drawing so many listeners that the rooms maxxed out their 5,000 person limit and sent people to overflow rooms. Conversations — including some with 2021 No. 1 Disruptor company Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev — about the WallStreetBets trading phenomenon drew buzz and interest. (Discord also found its user base growing among stock market traders this year.)For Clubhouse, exclusivity helped: the company capped the number of people who could join. New users needed an invite from a member and the company only expanded from iOS to Android devices this May after a year of iPhone exclusivity. CEO Paul Davison told CNBC this week that since the Android launch there are “millions more” waiting to join the platform. Voice is the oldest medium. … Voice is a durable medium.Paul Davison, Clubhouse CEOIn the ultimate validation of the innovative models from Discord and Clubhouse, the social media giants have launched similar services. Twitter first started testing Spaces, to enable people to click from a tweet to enter a live chat, late last year and has been rolling it out in 2021. Facebook announced ‘Live Audio Rooms’ in April — Zuckerberg said the company has been working on audio for “a very long time” — and also started testing a Q&A product where creators can talk to an audience (either with video or audio only), that can ask questions via either text or audio.Microsoft’s LinkedIn is working on an audio feature that will focus on professional conversations. To expand on the conversations that used to happen around the watercooler, Slack, recently acquired by Salesforce, has been experimenting with a feature designed to recreate the spontaneity of office hallway conversations. And in March, Spotify bought Betty Labs, the parent company of Locker Room, a Clubhouse alternative. Some social media trends come and go, but Clubhouse CEO Davison told CNBC this week that history is on the side of his company’s business model: “Voice is the oldest medium. … We’ve been gathering with other people in small groups and talking since the beginning of civilization. … Voice is a durable medium.”SIGN UP for our weekly, original newsletter that goes beyond the list, offering a closer look at CNBC Disruptor 50 companies, and the founders who continue to innovate across every sector of the economy.

British cops raid suspected bitcoin mine that was stealing electricity

British cops who were searching for a pot farm ended up uncovering a bitcoin mining operation that was illegally stealing electricity. 

Officers from the West Midlands police say they found a huge bank of around 100 computers trying to create cryptocurrency at a site they had been told was a marijuana farm outside Birmingham on May 18.

The facility, which cops said they “understood to be a bitcoin mining operation,” had stolen thousands of dollars worth of electricity to operate the hunt for online riches, police said. 

“It’s certainly not what we were expecting!” Sandwell police Sgt. Jennifer Griffin said in a statement. “It had all the hallmarks of a cannabis cultivation set-up and I believe it’s only the second such crypto mine we’ve encountered in the West Midlands.”

Police said they seized the mine’s IT equipment, but no arrests have been made. West Midlands Police

The cops were initially searching for a marijuana farm before stumbling on the mining site.West Midlands Police

Police said they seized the mine’s IT equipment, but no arrests have been made. 

So-called bitcoin “mining” involves using computers to solve complex math problems in an effort to be rewarded with freshly minted units of the popular cryptocurrency, which was worth around $36,000 per coin as of Friday.

The process, however, consumes a huge amount of power and has increasingly come under scrutiny for its impact on the environment. 

Police said they suspected a cannabis farm in part because of the large amount of visible electrical wiring. They added that ventilation ducts were visible and a police drone picked up a major heat source from above, leading cops to investigate it as a pot farm. 

“My understanding is that mining for cryptocurrency is not itself illegal but clearly abstracting electricity from the mains supply to power it is,” Griffin said. 

“We’ve seized the equipment and will be looking into permanently seizing it under the Proceeds of Crime Act,” she said. “No one was at the unit at the time of the warrant and no arrests have been made — but we’ll be making enquiries with the unit’s owner.”

Big Tech sues Florida over social media law, slams ‘state-run internet’

Trade groups representing Facebook, Twitter and Google have sued Florida over a new state law governing social media that Gov. Ron DeSantis claims will protect free speech.

The legislation, which DeSantis signed on Monday and is slated to take effect July 1, would allow the Florida Election Commission to fine social-media companies $250,000 per day if they “de-platform” candidates running for statewide office and $25,000 for candidates running for local office. It also prevents them from banning any “journalistic enterprise doing business in Florida.” 

DeSantis first came up with the idea in January after Twitter and Facebook banned then-President Donald Trump for inciting violence and spreading conspiracy theories about his election loss to President Joe Biden, which they cited as violations of their terms of service, the Tampa Bay Times reported. 

Tech trade groups NetChoice and the Computer and Communications Industry Association — which also represent Amazon, PayPal, TikTok, Airbnb and a slate of other firms — paint the law as violation of their First Amendment rights and a step toward a dystopian, government-controlled internet. 

“We cannot stand idly by as Florida’s lawmakers push unconstitutional bills into law that bring us closer to state-run media and a state-run internet,” said Carl Szabo, vice president and general counsel of NetChoice. “By weakening the First Amendment rights of some, Florida weakens the First Amendment rights of all.”

Gov. DeSantis reportedly got the idea for the new law after Facebook and Twitter banned former President Trump from their platforms.AP

The Florida law punishes tech companies “for taking virtually any action” to address “even highly objectionable or illegal content, no matter how much that content may conflict with their terms or policies,” the trade groups alleged in a Thursday complaint.  

DeSantis, widely considered a potential 2024 Republican candidate for president, claims the bill actually defends free speech. 

“When big tech censors enforce their rules inconsistently to discriminate in favor of the dominant ideology in Silicon Valley, they will be held accountable in the state of Florida, and all Floridians treated unfairly by big tech platforms will have the right to sue companies who violate this law,” DeSantis said the day he signed the bill.

The Florida law does not apply to internet platforms “operated by a company that owns and operates a theme park or entertainment complex” — an exception critics say shows its political nature by placating companies like Disney and NBCUniversal that are crucial to the state’s tourism sector. 

In a statement to the Post, DeSantis Press Secretary Christina Pushaw said the governor expected the bill to spark a court battle. 

“We have no comment on any specific lawsuit, but we anticipated legal challenges,” she said. “We are confident that this new legislation has a strong legal basis and protects Floridians’ constitutional rights.”

Conservatives and some liberals have levied accusations of political bias against social media companies like Twitter and Facebook for years, gaining steam after Trump’s ban and other high-profile incidents.

This week, Facebook caught heat over its content moderation policies after it reversed a ban on articles questioning whether COVID-19 escaped from a Chinese lab. 

Gov. DeSantis’ new law exempts theme park operators as well as any “journalistic enterprise doing business in Florida.”AP

In February 2020, Facebook slapped a “false information” tag on a Post opinion article arguing that the coronavirus may have escaped from a lab and that the Chinese government could not be trusted. Later on, the social media company outright banned any posts about the lab leak theory. 

The ban remained in place until Wednesday, when Facebook changed its policy after a Wall Street Journal report showed that US intelligence services allege that three researchers from the Wuhan Institute of Virology were hospitalized with COVID-19-like symptoms in November 2019. 

Key inflation indicator rose 3.1% from a year ago, highest since 1992

A key inflation indicator rose 3.1 percent in April from a year ago as costs continued to grow in the US economy just as it’s mounting a comeback from the pandemic, the feds said Friday.

It is the most since July 1992 that the core personal consumption expenditures index has risen over 12 months.

The so-called core PCE index, which excludes food and energy, rose 0.7 percent from March, the highest month-over-month rise since October 2001, the Commerce Department reported.

The index tracks prices across a variety of goods and services and is considered a broader measure for inflation than the Labor Department’s Consumer Price Index, which rose 4.2 percent in April from a year ago.

Including food and energy, which are more volatile than other goods, the Commerce Department’s index jumped 3.6 percent from a year ago and 0.6 percent from March.

Anu Gaggar, senior global investment analyst for Commonwealth Financial Network, noted that the big year-over-year numbers are likely warped because at this time last year the pandemic shuttered large swaths of society, driving prices down.

The PCE index, which excludes food and energy, rose 0.7 percent from March.Alamy Stock Photo

She added that some of the price increases are probably temporary as the economy gets going over the next couple of months. But others, she warned, could be here to stay.

“Rise in prices of some of the underlying components like travel services, used motor vehicles, etc. could be transitory and reflective of pent-up demand, but there are others such as medical care services where the rebound might be more structural and worth keeping an eye on,” she said after the data came out.

She noted that some prices in housing goods like lumber and agricultural commodities have fallen in recent weeks, but the new data “will keep the inflation chatter alive and kicking for longer.”

Economists predict a spending boost this summer.Alamy Stock Photo

Despite higher prices, Americans kept on spending.

Consumer spending rose 0.5 percent in April, much slower than the 4.7 percent gain in March, but that was partly fueled by federal stimulus checks, the report showed.

The report also showed a 13.1 percent drop in household income, which was likely driven down by the earlier burst of income caused by the latest round of $1,400 stimulus checks that came in March.

The rise in the index is the most since July 1992 that the core personal consumption expenditures index has risen over 12 months.Alamy Stock Photo

Despite that drop, many economists estimate that most Americans managed to squirrel away savings during the pandemic that will lead to a spending boost this summer.

But a variety of factors are causing problems for businesses that could hold back the recovery or drive prices even higher. A nationwide labor shortage has left many businesses short staffed and unable to operate at full capacity.

Other businesses have had trouble getting supplies delivered quickly enough to meet demand, in part because of labor tightness in trucking and transportation.

AMC shares soar on ‘meme stock’ rally, price doubles in a week

Shares of AMC Entertainment continued to soar Friday morning — even outpacing fellow so-called meme stock GameStop.

AMC was up more than 17 percent, trading at over $30 per share in the premarket, extending gains of about 35 percent from the day before. The stock has seen a dazzling rally this week that’s sent shares up more than 120 percent since Monday. 

The recent rally has given AMC a market cap of almost $12 billion, up from less than half a billion dollars last year. Shares are up more than 1,200 percent since January. 

GameStop, which led the market rally in January that seemingly pitted a massive community of traders on Reddit against hedge funds that were betting against the stock, has risen this week, too. 

Shares of GameStop were up more than 2 percent in the premarket, trading at $259 per share, after gaining almost 5 percent Thursday. The stock rallied about 15 percent Wednesday. 

With this week’s rally, AMC may have unseated GameStop as the favorite among Reddit traders. 

In the WallStreetBets Reddit forum, users shared countless posts cheering the movie theater chain. “Invested all my savings into AMC!!! Wish me luck guys,” one trending post read, while others shared images of their holdings. 

Retail investors on Twitter also rooted for the stock, with #AMCSTRONG, #AMC500k and #OccupyWallstreetAMC all trending on Thursday.

AMC is a heavily shorted stock, meaning that many investors are betting shares of the company will drop in value. Almost 20 percent of AMC shares are currently sold short, compared with an average of 5 percent short interest in a typical US stock, according to data from Ortex Analytics.

An AMC theater is seen in Times Square as the company’s stock continues to rise.Christopher Sadowski

When a heavily shorted stock spikes in value, short sellers are forced to buy back borrowed shares at a loss to close their position and stymie losses. That forced buying can further fuel the rally in what’s referred to as a “short squeeze.” 

Short sellers betting against AMC have lost about $1.75 billion just this week, according to the data from Ortex.

As reddit traders fuel the rally, Wall Street analysts focused on the underlying value of AMC’s assets are likely looking on in confusion. 

While the movie-going business is picking up as Americans emerge from the pandemic, AMC suffered substantial losses over the past year. The company has some $5.4 billion in debt, it announced in its first-quarter earnings report, and has $1 billion in liquidity. 

The rally in the company’s stock price has helped it raise fresh cash to fund ongoing operations. But the company has yet to make a profit on a quarter since the pandemic struck.

For the first quarter of 2021, AMC posted a net loss of $567.2 million compared with a loss of $2.18 billion a year earlier as the pandemic took hold. 

Box CEO says he'd consider a sale of the company amid feud with activist investor Starboard

Box CEO Aaron Levie sat down with CNBC’s Josh Lipton this week to talk about the company’s feud with activist investor Starboard Value. Starboard has made several accusations against Box, claiming the cloud company is underperforming.In the interview, Levie discusses his plans to return value to shareholders and says he’d be open to selling the company if it made sense to do so. He also highlights Box’s latest quarterly results to show the company is performing well, despite Starboard’s claims.Watch the video above to hear highlights from the interview and Levie’s thoughts on the activist shareholder battle within his company.

Massive bitcoin mine discovered in UK after police raid suspected cannabis farm

Bitcoin mine uncovered during Black Country industrial unit raid that was stealing thousands of pounds worth of electricity from the mains supply.Source: West Midlands PoliceLONDON — An illegal bitcoin mine has been found by police in the U.K. who were looking for a cannabis farm.The mine — located in an industrial unit on the outskirts of the English city of Birmingham — was stealing thousands of pounds worth of electricity from the mains supply, West Midlands Police said Thursday.Police searched the unit in Sandwell on May 18 on the back of intelligence that led them to believe it was being used as a cannabis farm.Lots of people were visiting the unit at various points of the day, police said, adding there was lots of wiring and ventilation ducts visible A police drone also detected a lot of heat coming from the building.These are all “classic signs” of a cannabis farm, police said. However, officers found a bank of around 100 computers and zero cannabis on entering the building.”It’s certainly not what we were expecting,” Jennifer Griffin, Sandwell police sergeant, said in a statement. “It had all the hallmarks of a cannabis cultivation set-up and I believe it’s only the second such crypto mine we’ve encountered in the West Midlands.”Bitcoin mine uncovered during Black Country industrial unit raid that was stealing thousands of pounds worth of electricity from the mains supply.Source: West Midlands PoliceBitcoin miners use purpose-built computers to solve complex mathematical equations that effectively enable a bitcoin transaction to go through. The miners are rewarded for their efforts in the digital currency.However, the entire process is incredibly energy intensive because of the amount of power used by the computers. Bitcoin has a carbon footprint comparable to that of New Zealand, producing 36.95 megatons of CO2 annually, according to Digiconomist.”My understanding is that mining for cryptocurrency is not itself illegal but clearly abstracting electricity from the mains supply to power it is,” Griffin said.The computer equipment has been seized but no arrests have been made.Read more about cryptocurrencies from CNBC ProGoldman, Roubini and Novogratz explain where they stand on bitcoin and etherCathie Wood sees deflation returning, boosting innovation stocks and bitcoinHow another ‘crypto winter’ could affect Coinbase’s stock price, according to MizuhoOn Wednesday, Iran’s government announced a ban on the mining of bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, as officials blame the energy-intensive process for blackouts in a number of Iranian cities.Around 4.5% of all bitcoin mining globally took place in Iran between January and April of this year, according to blockchain analytics firm Elliptic. That put it among the top 10 in the world, while China came in first place at nearly 70%.China’s Inner Mongolia region plans to ban new cryptocurrency mining projects and shut down existing activity in a bid to cut down on the energy-consuming operation.— Additional reporting by CNBC’s Natasha Turak.